KPMG Financial Services Consulting - Defining a Market Strategy

To be more successful, businesses should manageThese were people who usually had Executive Vice
more strategically. There is at least one business thatPresident titles, or sometimes Vice Chairman titles,
took its own advice and did just that, withand who had full profit and loss responsibility for
outstanding results. This brief article discusses theretail, corporate, capital markets, and other major
early steps in that business's strategic managementbusinesses. Other firms were focused on the heads
process, and provides a good example of howof technology, the Board of Directors, or at lower
strategic management can dramatically improve alevels across the organization. Other firms did not
business's performance.identify strongly with the executives who had
During the years from 1993 to 2001, KPMG's financialday-to-day responsibility for the P&L, and who
services consulting practice (FSC) in the United Stateswere also the chief visionaries for their businesses in
grew at an unprecedented rate. Revenue for thethe market.
practice grew during that period at a compoundFSC's market strategy appealed to line of business
annual growth rate of just over 40%. Outside theheads, and they controlled significant consulting
US, this high rate of growth began a couple of yearsbudgets. The market strategy demanded in depth
later than in the US, but once started the resultsknowledge of the business. Functional knowledge was
were similar. From a starting point of less than $100also important, but only within the context of the
million in 1993, in 2001, after several years ofbusiness knowledge. Most of the time, the issues
significant growth, global revenue for FSC exceededfaced by line of business heads could not be
$1.2 billion.segmented into functional components. It was
There were many factors that contributed to thisnecessary to blend various functional skills, such as
extraordinary growth. The purpose of this article is tostrategy, risk, finance, operations, and technology,
discuss one of them, the market strategy that wasinto project teams, all with deep business knowledge.
defined for the practice. A strong case can be madeBuying Factors
that market strategy was the most important factorThe line of business heads, who were FSC's natural
in the success of the practice, but regardless, it didclients, had two buying factors that could not be
at least represent the first step in moving thecompromised when selecting consulting firms:
practice forward.- There could be no learning of the business on the
Market Strategyjob. FSC not only embraced this buying factor, but
The market strategy that was selected for FSC wastried to take it a step further. The goal was to
"business management". That market strategyassign professionals to projects that knew the
proved to be an excellent choice for FSC, for abusiness better than client personnel ever could.
couple of major reasons:Therefore, best practices in the industry were
- The "business management" strategy clearlyintroduced to clients in the normal course of
differentiated FSC from competitors. At the time,consulting projects.
firms in the market that were consulting to financial- Consulting expenditures had to have bottom line
services organizations could be categorized into threepayback. Once understood, this buying factor
major types. There were systems integration andbecame a benefit to FSC. The heads of business lines
managed services firms that approached the marketwere much more inclined to spend money on
with their functional skills and large pools of resources.consulting projects when there was a quantified
There were general strategy firms that approachedknown payback. FSC had the knowledge and
the market with their consulting process andconfidence to make commitments when necessary
corporate level reputations. There were also dozenson paybacks.
of niche firms that approached the market with their* * * * * *
knowledge and experience in a limited array ofFSC enjoyed unprecedented growth during the
services. No firms in the market offered services1990's. One of the major factors contributing to that
where depth of business knowledge was agrowth was FSC's market strategy of "business
requirement. FSC chose that path, and quicklymanagement". The market strategy appealed to the
became differentiated in the marketplace.internal heads of lines of business, who became FSC's
- The "business management" strategy built on FSC'snatural clients. These natural clients had requirements
core strengths. Traditionally, FSC hired consultantsfor selecting consulting firms that demanded deep
with at least three years of industry experience. Thisbusiness knowledge and payback on consulting
hands-on business experience became a goodexpenditures. The market strategy proved to be
starting point for developing even more depth ofeffective for FSC.
business knowledge and understanding of bestTaking the first step along the strategic management
practices across an industry.pathway required a tremendous amount of
Natural Clientinformation gathering, analysis, insights, and hard
The natural clients for FSC's "business management"work, but in the end, the results were worth the
strategy were the heads of the internal lines ofeffort. FSC would not have been as successful during
business at the large financial services organizations.that period without, first, thinking strategically.