Implied Licenses and Ownership of Intellectual Property Rights in the United Kingdom

In Robin Ray v Classic FM, the English High Court held1996 that Classic FM intended to exploit Mr Ray's
that a contractor providing services owns thework overseas. The court was not prepared to imply
intellectual property in the materials created for thea licence into the contract that Classic FM would be
client. The decision is a useful guide to contractors asentitled to exploit his work overseas. Classic FM was
it is one of the leading cases in determining theprevented from exploiting their database abroad
whether a commissioner of intellectual property maywithout the consent of Mr Ray, which would require
use intellectual property for purposes not expresslypayment of license fees.
contemplated by a written agreement.When implying licences in this way, a court will only
Backgroundgo so far as is necessary in the circumstances to
Mr Ray was a highly respected expert in classicalgive effect to the intention of the parties. If a grant
music in England , reputed to have an encyclopaedicof a licence is required, the ambit of the licence will
knowledge of classical music. He was engaged bybe the minimum required to give effect to the
Classic FM in the United Kingdom in 1991 to compileintention of the parties at the time of the contract.
the radio station's repertoire, compile playlists,An implied term that copyright would be assigned to
categorising tracks for play lists, and rate theira client will be exceptionally rare, as most often an
popularity under each of the categories. The contractexclusive licence will have the same effect in law.
did not deal with intellectual property rights. TheThe judge held that the contractor retains the
consultancy agreement was originally for 11 months,copyright in default of some express or implied term
however the work of Mr Ray proved beneficial forto the contrary effect. The contract may expressly
Classic FM, and his services were extended until 1997.state which party is entitled to the copyright, and the
Some 50,000 tracks were eventually categorised.mere fact that the contractor has been
The results of the work were incorporated into acommissioned - performed by a contractor - is
database that was used to select music on ainsufficient to grant rights in the copyright to the
rotational basis, and prevent overplaying.client. In the absence of express rights, the client is
The project was success. After internal use forleft to establish an entitlement under the express or
about 5 years, Classic FM proposed to licence theimplied term of the contract.
database to overseas companies. Mr Ray objectedConclusion
and commenced proceedings to prevent Classic FMThe decision means that contractors retain the
licensing the use outside the UK without hiscopyright in the absence of an implied or express
permission, on the basis that he was the author ofterm. An implied licence must be reasonable and
documents that were incorporated into the database.equitable; necessary to give business efficacy to the
The Decision of the High Courtcontract, capable of clear expression and not
Mr Justice Lightman in the High Court ruled that in thecontrary to any express term of the contract, and
case of a consultancy, the author retained theso obvious that it goes without saying. This means
copyright in the absence of an express or impliedthat a licence will be implied for the client to use the
term to the contrary effect. Where services by awork for the stated purposes at the outset of the
consultant are performed for an express purpose, aengagement. It is important to document the
court will readily imply a term into a contract forpurposes of the engagement and the intended use
services that a client is entitled to use it for thatfor the copyright work created during the course of
purpose. In this case, Classic FM always intended tothe engagement.
utilise the Mr Ray's work in the UK . It was not until