Avoid Strategic Planning Mistakes

Each of the following strategic planning mistakes ismeeting location doesn't have to be fancy. In fact,
costly. In fact, committing any one of them could killyou can assemble a bunch of chairs in someone's
your strategic plan. Following the description of eachliving room. Just so you get away from the office
is an instruction on how to avoid the mistake.and its accompanying interruptions.
Mistake number 1: Arbitrarily selecting your planningMistake number 8: Not allowing enough time for the
team membersprocess.
Many managers give insufficient consideration toSome management teams want to get through their
choosing their planning team members. They simplyplanning process just as quickly as possible. Here
select a few senior managers with too little thoughtagain, they're interested in "getting back to work." So
about their potential contribution to building a viablethey run through each of the process steps as
strategic plan. Also, they don't consider whether eachquickly as they can. As a result, their thought process
team member is positioned to drive the successfulis hardly strategic and their resultant strategies prove
implementation of the resultant strategies.disappointing.
How to avoid this mistake: Consider carefully theHow to avoid this mistake: Allow sufficient time.
selection of each and every member of your planningMake sure that each of your discussions goes to
team. And keep these two criteria in mind:o Willingsufficient depth. Remember, planning is a long-term
and capable of strategic thought - to assist in theinvestment. Properly performed, your planning
development of your strategic plan.o Positioned, insessions will pay back many times your investment.
the organization, to drive the successfulMistake number 9: Doing it alone.
implementation of your resultant strategies.Instead of retaining a skilled strategy consultant to
Mistake number 2: Thinking of strategic planning as anlead their strategy sessions, some managers decide
event, rather than a process.to lead those sessions themselves. They soon learn,
Some managers will set aside time to develop theirhowever, that they can't effectively lead the process
plan. So far, so good. Unfortunately, they'll then adoptand, at the same time, participate in the strategy
- and communicate - an attitude of "let's get it donediscussions. Both process and content suffer.
and get back to work." Clearly, they fail to integrateHow to avoid this mistake: Retain a skilled strategy
their plan into the day-to-day operation of theirconsultant to lead your sessions. You and your team
business.will take responsibility for content; your strategy
How to avoid this mistake: Adopt the attitude thatconsultant, for process. You'll benefit in both areas.
planning is an integral part of the operation of yourAnd make sure that your consultant has both
business. In fact, your strategies, once detailed, willexpertise in the planning process and the
become a description of work to be performed. Sointerpersonal skills necessary to facilitate your
when you and your planning team "gets back tostrategy sessions.
work," they'll be working at accomplishing yourMistake number 10: Stifling communication.
strategies.Unfortunately, some managers stifle team members'
Mistake number 3: Not educating your planning teamopinions which differ from their own. The results are
members to the strategic planning process.quite predictable - loss of valuable input plus damage
Believe it or not, some planning teams enter theirto team members' buy-in.
strategy sessions "cold" - without first learning theHow to avoid this mistake: Allow, in fact welcome,
process in which they're about to engage. This is ainput from all. Ask questions to encourage
terrible mistake - for two reasons. First, the resultantparticipation. Then listen. And ask more questions.
lack of understanding seriously affects performance.Mistake number 11: Keeping your strategy a secret.
Thus the quality of the resultant plan - and theSome decide not to publish a written strategic plan,
strategies within the plan - suffer. Second, failure tobut rather keep it private among the few top
educate the planning team misses the opportunity tomanagers who developed it. But since others must
build enthusiasm among the team's members. Thehelp to implement the resultant strategies, they'll
quality of their discussions, the resultant strategies,certainly need to know "what's up"? Of course,
and the implementation of those strategies all suffer.strategy implementation suffers.
How to avoid this mistake: Conduct a StrategicHow to avoid this mistake: Be open with
Planning Workshop for your planning team members.communication of your strategic plan. You'll improve
The workshop will not only educate, but also buildthe implementation of your strategies - for two
your managers' enthusiasm for the process. Andreasons. First, your employees will know what they're
make sure that the workshop includes a case study -to work on, and why. Second, they'll feel more like
so your team members will experience building a "mini"insiders." They'll simply care a whole lot more.
strategic plan." While doing so, they'll extend theirMistake number 12: Putting your plan on the shelf and
thinking to your own organization. They'll then bekeeping it there.
eager to apply the process "in real life."Some management teams stop short of defining
Mistake number 4: Not involving employees beyondspecific action steps (tactics) to detail their strategies.
your planning team members.And they don't conduct quarterly reviews. They
Some managers don't even think about askingsimply assume that once they've developed their
employees (beyond the planning team) to help. Thisstrategies, those strategies will simply happen -
mistake guarantees that the organization will missalmost automatically. No way! As Peter Drucker
valuable input. Also, it will squander the opportunity towisely advised, "Nothing happens until we reduce
build enthusiasm for implementation of the resultantstrategy to work."
strategies.How to avoid this mistake: Detail your strategies in
How to avoid this mistake: Consider the many waysaction plans descriptive of work assignments.
to include your employees in the process - both forConduct quarterly reviews of your strategic plan and
the benefit of their input, and to build theirmore frequent reviews of your action plans. Thus,
enthusiasm. For example:o Providing thoughtsyou'll link your strategies to individuals' work
(through interview or survey) on issues to discussoassignments.
Assistance in gathering pre-planning informationoMistake number 13: Failure to link your strategic plan
Detailing resultant strategies through development ofto your budgeting process.
action plans (lists of tactics)o Estimating resourcesBelieve it or not, some actually fail to allocate
required to accomplish strategieso Implementation ofresources to their strategies. They simply assume
resultant strategiesthat the money, people, facilities and equipment will
Mistake number 5: Ignoring the question of timing.automatically be available. Far more often than not,
Some assume that any time of the year is as goodthis assumption leads to disappointment.
as any other for developing strategy. Not true.How to avoid this mistake: Estimate required
Planning out of phase with your budgeting processresources while developing your action plans. Then
will leave you trying to implement this year'suse those estimates to request resources in your
strategies with last year's resources.budgeting process.
How to avoid this mistake: Make sure your timing isMistake number 14: Reluctance to revise your
such that your strategies "feed your budgetingstrategic plan.
process." That way, you'll be able to allocateSome managers consider their strategic plan "cast in
resources in support of your strategies.concrete." No matter what happens "out there in the
Mistake number 6: Failing to gather applicableworld," they stubbornly insist on sticking to their
information for your strategy sessions.strategies. This works just fine until something
At times, planning teams meet to develop theirchanges. Unfortunately, our world - more and more
strategic plan without having gathered theoften - is characterized by significant change. So
information necessary to strategic thinking andreluctance to alter the plan "no matter what," can
decision making. Naturally, their strategy suffers.prove a recipe for disaster.
How to avoid this mistake: Have the members ofHow to avoid this mistake: Remain alert to significant
your planning team meet to decide on thechange in the world around you. And if change should
information they'll need to gather, and lateroccur which might affect your strategy, call your
communicate with each other, in preparation for theirplanning team together. Ask your team two
upcoming strategy sessions. Then, just prior to yourquestions: (a) "How is this change likely to affect our
strategy sessions, conduct an Information Sharingstrategy"? and (b) "How should we, therefore,
Meeting. At that meeting, each person responsible forchange our strategy in response?"
information gathering should present to the entireMistake number 15: Resistance to change.
planning team... hand-outs, viewgraphs, and questionSome resist developing any strategy which calls for
and answer all work well. The intent is to build thesignificant change. This is understandable, for such
knowledge of all on your planning team... giving allstrategies are often met with resistance. But
team members a more general managementsignificant change, at times, is required.
overview... preparing each to make moreHow to avoid this mistake: Remain open to tough,
knowledge-based, strategic decisions at yourthough necessary, decisions. Try this - when
up-coming strategy sessions.discussing a problem, ask your planning team to
Mistake number 7: Conducting your strategy sessionsconsider the following four choices: (a) Is it a
at the office.resource problem? (b) Is it a people problem? (c) Is it
Conducting strategy sessions at the office generallya process or a systems problem? (d) Is it an
comes complete with numerous interruptions mostorganizational problem? Agreement on the source of
disruptive to concentration. Both the quality of yourthe problem will bring clarity to your need for a
discussions and the quality of your resultant plan willsolution. This clarity, in turn, will go a long way toward
suffer.breaking down resistance to change.
How to avoid this mistake: Meet "off campus." Your